Economics is a social science that constitute an integral part
of the ideology which prevails in a certain society. Thus, there
is no Islamic �Economics� per se unless there is am Islamic
Ideology prevailing and applied in the total life and activities
of a Muslim community. Stock market being an important
institution of the financial sector of the economy is also
subject to the same criteria.
The importance of stock market and its rapid emergence in
Pakistan as well as other Muslim thinkers and scholars and
involvement of the masses to make deep examination of this
institution, reject what is found repugnant to Islam and
legitimize that could be accommodated. Unfortunately there is no
state-wide example where economy is managed according to Islam
injunctions. The Muslim scholars and economists are therefore
only clarifying the theory and soliciting through their writings
and speeches commitment of the masses and the government for an
Islamic alternative.
What, therefore, is presented here is a review of the opinions
offered by eminent scholars and specialists, which still awaits
to be tested within a total Islamic framework.
The paper is organized as follows. Section one will discuss the
role of stock market in economic development as recognized by
Islamic economists. Section two will discuss permissibility of
various assets and contracts that are traded on the contemporary
stock market. Section three will address the issue of
speculation in the stock market followed by concluding remarks.
A bibliography is also provided at the end to facilitate the
interest reader to explore more on the subject.
1. ROLE OF STOCK MARKET IN ECONOMISED BY MUSLIM ECONOMISTS:
Economic development and the development of financial markets a
re closely related to each other to the extent that a cause and
effect relationship is considered to exist the development of
financial sector causing growth in the real sector. The
importance of the financial markets cannot be marginalized and
various turning points in the history testify to its
significance. The commercial revolution that started in Europe
in the tenth and eleventh century was essentially about
innovation and adoption of new financial techniques and
development of new commercial practices that resulted in
expansion of trade gradually over the centuries. It was the
first step, silent and slow though, that resulted in the rise of
the West.
In that period various institutions such as the trade fairs, and
guild merchant organization came into being to meet the needs of
trade and commerce.
Evident from Muslim history also suggests similar pattern. The
contracts such as mudarbah and musharika were not by
�prescription,� but were modifications of the existing contracts
that the Prophet (salallah-o-alaihiwasallum) approved or did not
prohibit.
These same contracts were later passed on to Europe through
Italian and Jewish merchants trading in the Mediterranean
region. The contractual form known as �commenda� in the medieval
Europe was actually derived from mudarbah contract. This suggest
that the development of contractual forms and financial
techniques are constantly in flux and follow an evolution
process within the boundaries of the norms and values of a
society. This development is geared towards solving particular
requirements of the economy relating to provision of liquidity,
flexibility in transactions and ease in application.
When we look at the stock market, which is a vital arm of the
contemporary financial system, we must not confine attention to
a few contracts termed �Islamic � and ignore the possibility of
coming up with new contractual forms that are compatible with
the principles of Shari�ah. At the same time we will have to
bring to contracts that violate the rules of Shari�ah. Thus a
right question to ask is: what are the requirements of the
economy in our period and how those requirements can be met
through the existing or by development of new contractual forms
that are in line with the principles of Sharia. This is exactly
the question asked explicitly by El Gari in his 1993 paper and
by many other Muslim scholars implicitly in their analyses.
The first thing to note in the literature dealing with stock
market form Islamic point of view is that no author has negated
the usefulness of this institution. Rather they have appreciated
its existence, and demonstrated a good understanding of the
functions and objectives of the stock market which are:
1. To attract savings and channel them for investment.
2. Match the preferences of the savers and investors pertaining
to liquidity, risk and return by designing appropriate
contractual forms that can finance a long term project through a
series of short term financing contracts.
3. Make available tools to price the investment risk.
4. Provide a yardstick to evaluate tools to price the investment
risk.
These objectives are served by taking a number of measures : (i)
span the possibility of risk and return positions, (ii) increase
the contract enforceability, (iii) reduce the contract
negotiation costs, and (iv) increase the chances of matching the
buyers and the sellers. Few such measures are :
a. Standardization of contractual forms. This has direct bearing
on lowering the negotiation cost, and the ease in analysis of
risk and return aspect of an asset.
b. Recording and registration of each contract. This helps in
enforceability.
c. Existence of a central clearing house. This can help in
matching of buyers and sellers.
The second thing to note in this literature is discussion on
permissible forms of securities � financial contracts. This is
the topic of the next section.
2. VIEWS ON PERMISSIBILITY OF VARIOUS CONTRACTS
The asset claims traded on the present day stock market include,
(i) various types of bonds, (ii) shares of stocks, (iii)
options, (iv) warrants, (v) future, (vi) forward contracts and,
(vii) other derivative securities.
TRADE IN BONDS
There is an agreement on non-permissibility of bonds because
they are claims of interest.
TRADE IN SHARES
As far as the sale and purchase of shares is concerned Muslim
Scholars permitted its trade both in the primary as well as in
the secondary markets. The understanding is that buying a share
of a company is establishing ownership in the assets of the firm
in proportion to that share. Views on permissibility and
conditions are briefly outlined below :
We refer here to Mualana Taqi Usmani (1994) who gave his opinion
that shares signify ownership in a company�s assets to the
extent and value of the shares held. It is thus joining
entrepreneurship like Qirad or Mudaraba and is permissible. In
the case of initial floatation, a person buys share(s), yet in
fact, from Sharia viewpoint, he purchase nothing material but
only a certificate of ownership in the company�s assets in
proportion to the number of shares held. If the business of the
company is not forbidden, the deal is permissible.
After the initial stage, the resale of such shares only means
changing hands of the ownership. For such an exchange, Shariah
impose certain conditions :
(i) As noted above, the business of the company should be halal.
(ii) The company�s asset should not be wholly liquid; it must
have acquired fixed assets too, otherwise the sale of shares
above par or below par will not be permissible, because this
will make the case of riba-al-fadhl, like exchange wheat for
wheat, gold for gold and money for money with a differential
price.
(iii) In a situation where the assets are both in liquid and
fixed forms, the minimum price cannot be below the proportionate
value of liquid assets.
(iv) If a company is �provisionally listed,� its shares cannot
be purchased or sold above or below the face value (value at
par). Because this company, by definition, is in the process of
mobilizing funds and no part of that is yet physically invested.
In essence these measures define an endogenous lower limit for
the share price of each firm that depends upon its assets
structure. It is therefore, essential that each firm announce
its balance sheet regularly and correctly.
An advantage of this method of asset pricing is that the asset
prices are more linked with the actual economic activity.
OPTIONS
Purchase of a �call option� is purchase of a right to buy a
commodity or services in future at a price that is agreed upon
today. This right will be exercised by the purchaser when doing
so is beneficial. This happens when in the arrival of that
exercise period the price in the spot market is higher than the
price agreed upon in the call contract.
Purchase of a �put option� is purchase of a right, on payment of
a fee today, to sell a commodity or services in (some) future
(date) at a price that is agreed upon today. This purchased
right will be exercised when the spot price of the commodity or
services is lower than the exercise price.
Majority of writers in the area of Islamic economics are of the
opinion that �options� are not permissible in Islam. El-Gari
differs from this in that he justifies call options on th basis
of permissibility of bai al-arboon by the followers of Imam
Hanmbal�s school of fiqh. Bai al-baroon is a sale agreement in
which a security deposit is given in advance as a partial
payment towards the price of the commodity purchased. This
deposit is fortified if the buyer failed to meet his obligation.
El-Gari�s opinion is based on making analogy between two non-anologous
contracts, that is , the al-arboon sale contracts and the call
option. In al-arboon the advance payment is made towards the
price of the commodity purchased. The partial payment in advance
obliges the seller to reserve the commodity for this buyer and
not to sell it to another person unless the buyer refuses to buy
it by refusing the remaining payment. Whereas in the case of
call option (i) the price paid is the price for the option to
buy a commodity and not the partial payment towards the price of
the commodity, (ii) often the commodity itself on which the
options are sold and purchased is not possessed by the seller
and sometimes the commodity may not exist, (iii) the option
itself can be re-traded to any buyer for a price. So the two
contracts are not equivalent.
El-Gari also rationalizes permissibility of the put option by
arguing that it is a fee for the service by the buyer of put
option to sell the commodity in future at an agreed upon price.
All other writers on Islamic economics do not consider options a
legitimate instrument.
FORWARDED CONTRACTS
Role of forward contracts is more important and justifiable in
commodity exchange than in the stock exchange to facilitate
dealings in varied circumstances. Khan states that �from the
Islamic point of view there is hardly anything objectionable in
the basic operation of the forward market. Individual
transactions may have certain elements which need to be modified
in the light of Islamic law�.
FUTURES
According to Khan , the trade in futures is not permissible in
Islam because the commodity that is traded is non-existant, �it
does not involve physical transfer of commodities and successive
sales are made without anyone actually owning the commodity.�
3. SPECULATION
An important aspect of the contemporary stock market is the
existence of high degree of speculative trade.
As a result the stock prices fluctuate too much to be justified
by changes in the economic fundamentals. The stock price then
becomes un-informative for the valuation of investment
opportunities and in chanelling of funds for the efficient
allocation. Confirming to this there are many studies. One can
look into the study by Balnchard. Rhee, and Summers (1993) who
found limited role for market valuation when managers take
investment decisions. In addition to the empirical findings
there are also theoretical arguments on how speculation is price
destabilizating and welfare reducing activity.
Recognizing the possibility of speculation, all authors, who are
surveyed here, advocate a sane stock market where prices should
not suffer from undue volatility and gyration.
Chapra (1985) identified forward purchase or sale of stock on
margin as the source of unhealthy movements in stock prices.
Because most of these deals are made without the intention of
taking or making the actual delivery . According to him �Margin
purchases and sales bring about an unnecessary expansion or
contraction in the volume of transactions and, hence, in stock
prices, without any real change in the economic conditions. �
For sale of shares before effective delivery the principle is
that nothing can be sold without not only �physical possession�
but also �constructive possession�. When something in under
one�s own �risk�, only then it can be sold ahead. For this
purpose the effective exchange of risk is considered enough,
although a more careful approach will be to await physical
delivery and receipt of the share certificate.
If shares are purchased only for capital gain then the whole
amount of shares will be subject to zakat deduction. Otherwise
zakat is deductible only on liquid assets which means excluding
buildings and machinery.
El-Gari (1993, p.9) also recognizes the possibility of
speculative activity to the extent of gambling �because the
forms and modes of the contracts do not reveal the real
intentions and aims� of the investor. He proposed three
regulations (i) use of tax system. For example, taxing at higher
rate, the capital gain obtained by selling the share quickly
after the purchase, and taxing it at a lower rate if the same
share is held for longer period. (ii) Placing a limit on the
share purchase by institutional investors. (iii) Putting
restriction on price changes within a day.
Metwally (1984) is also very much concerned about how to
distinguish price changes resulting from changes in performance
of a firm and those resulting from the changes in the psychology
of the market. In order to reduce the excess violatility in
asset prices and tie them more closely to the real economic
activity he proposes formation of a regulatory body � Management
Committee of the stock exchange that should determine the price
ceiling for each stock based on the company�s average net worth.
He also recommends specified trading periods for trade in shares
so as to reduce the frequency of trading.
But this proposal goes against the liquidity aspect of the stock
market. The fixation of the price ceiling is itself difficult
job that requires too much information process that is not
readily available.
|